Following extensive research at the University of Lincoln, we have developed the DBR24©. This is structured professional judgement guidance for the assessment of human-directed dog bite risk.
The DBR24© guides professionals through the risk assessment process by providing a structured approach, which comprehensively considers factors that the scientific evidence suggests may influence the risk of a dog biting a person. This is the first time that structured professional judgement has been applied to the assessment of dog bites; it is a well-established and extensively researched model that is used in the field of forensic psychology for the assessment of human violence.
By using an evidence-based model, professionals are more likely to better predict and prevent dog bites. It is hoped that the DBR24© will encourage more professionals to move away from using provocative tests when carrying out behaviour assessments, which research suggest are not predictive of how a dog may behave in the future in a home environment. Exposing dogs to distressing stimuli in assessments that we know are unlikely to predict future behaviour raises ethical concerns.
Users of the DBR24© must successfully attend a formal training course to become licensed users of the guidelines. This training will likely improve consistency between professionals making risk judgements.
For more details about the DBR24© please visit www.dbr24.com.